Microsoft 365 Security

Microsoft 365 Secure Score Explainer

Use Microsoft 365 Secure Score as one evidence source, then review the affected users, data, licenses, exceptions, and operational impact before prioritizing each recommendation.

CISO-led guidance from Ali Hassani, backed by 25+ years of IT, cybersecurity, compliance, and infrastructure experience.

Built for audit and compliance decisions

OC Security Audit supports independent assessment, cybersecurity audit, compliance readiness, control validation, and executive-level risk communication. When findings require technical remediation, IT Perfection can support Microsoft 365 administration, configuration, monitoring, and implementation while OC Security Audit validates risk and evidence.

Important note: This tool is for initial guidance only and does not replace a professional cybersecurity audit, compliance assessment, penetration test, legal review, or insurance underwriting review.

Assessment items with audit guidance

Open each item to review what it means, how to check it, why it matters, the likely risk level, the business impact, and trusted reference links.

Conditional Access and MFA maturityRisk: HighImpact: High

Description

Conditional Access and MFA maturity should be reviewed as an evidence-based audit area for Microsoft 365 Security Audit. The goal is to determine whether the organization can prove the control exists, works consistently, and has an accountable owner.

How to check

Check administrator portals, identity policies, privileged role assignments, conditional access or MFA reports, and recent sign-in logs. Confirm both ordinary users and administrators are covered.

Why it is important

Identity compromise is one of the fastest paths to ransomware, data theft, cloud compromise, and unauthorized administrative change.

Privileged role governanceRisk: HighImpact: High

Description

Privileged role governance should be reviewed as an evidence-based audit area for Microsoft 365 Security Audit. The goal is to determine whether the organization can prove the control exists, works consistently, and has an accountable owner.

How to check

Check administrator portals, identity policies, privileged role assignments, conditional access or MFA reports, and recent sign-in logs. Confirm both ordinary users and administrators are covered.

Why it is important

Identity compromise is one of the fastest paths to ransomware, data theft, cloud compromise, and unauthorized administrative change.

Exchange Online protection postureRisk: HighImpact: High

Description

Exchange Online protection posture should be reviewed as an evidence-based audit area for Microsoft 365 Security Audit. The goal is to determine whether the organization can prove the control exists, works consistently, and has an accountable owner.

How to check

Review anti-phishing, SPF, DKIM, DMARC, safe links or attachment controls, quarantine reports, user reporting workflow, and recent email security incidents.

Why it is important

This control supports audit readiness, risk reduction, executive visibility, and practical remediation planning.

SharePoint and OneDrive sharing controlsRisk: MediumImpact: Medium

Description

SharePoint and OneDrive sharing controls should be reviewed as an evidence-based audit area for Microsoft 365 Security Audit. The goal is to determine whether the organization can prove the control exists, works consistently, and has an accountable owner.

How to check

Review the related admin console, screenshots, policies, logs, reports, tickets, exception records, and owner accountability evidence. Validate the control by evidence, not by memory.

Why it is important

This control supports audit readiness, risk reduction, executive visibility, and practical remediation planning.

Defender and endpoint integrationRisk: HighImpact: Medium

Description

Defender and endpoint integration should be reviewed as an evidence-based audit area for Microsoft 365 Security Audit. The goal is to determine whether the organization can prove the control exists, works consistently, and has an accountable owner.

How to check

Review the related admin console, screenshots, policies, logs, reports, tickets, exception records, and owner accountability evidence. Validate the control by evidence, not by memory.

Why it is important

This control supports audit readiness, risk reduction, executive visibility, and practical remediation planning.

Audit logging and retention settingsRisk: MediumImpact: High

Description

Audit logging and retention settings should be reviewed as an evidence-based audit area for Microsoft 365 Security Audit. The goal is to determine whether the organization can prove the control exists, works consistently, and has an accountable owner.

How to check

Confirm audit logs are enabled, retained long enough for investigation, protected from tampering, and reviewed through alerts, reports, or SIEM workflows.

Why it is important

Without reliable logs, the organization may not be able to investigate incidents, support insurance claims, or prove control operation during an audit.

Data loss prevention and sensitivity labelsRisk: MediumImpact: Medium

Description

Data loss prevention and sensitivity labels should be reviewed as an evidence-based audit area for Microsoft 365 Security Audit. The goal is to determine whether the organization can prove the control exists, works consistently, and has an accountable owner.

How to check

Review the related admin console, screenshots, policies, logs, reports, tickets, exception records, and owner accountability evidence. Validate the control by evidence, not by memory.

Why it is important

This control supports audit readiness, risk reduction, executive visibility, and practical remediation planning.

Secure Score exception documentationRisk: MediumImpact: Medium

Description

Secure Score exception documentation should be reviewed as an evidence-based audit area for Microsoft 365 Security Audit. The goal is to determine whether the organization can prove the control exists, works consistently, and has an accountable owner.

How to check

Review the related admin console, screenshots, policies, logs, reports, tickets, exception records, and owner accountability evidence. Validate the control by evidence, not by memory.

Why it is important

This control supports audit readiness, risk reduction, executive visibility, and practical remediation planning.

Quick self-score

Use this scoring panel after reviewing the detail sections above. Score based on evidence: screenshots, policies, logs, reports, tickets, and owner accountability.

0%
Not started

Select each control area to see the readiness level.

Priority remediation roadmap

1. Validate

Confirm the real control state with evidence and identify gaps that could affect audit, insurance, compliance, or executive risk decisions.

2. Prioritize

Rank findings by business impact, likelihood, compliance exposure, and operational dependency.

3. Track

Create a remediation roadmap with owners, dates, evidence requirements, and follow-up validation.

Ali Hassani, CISO and cybersecurity audit consultant in Orange County

Created by Ali Hassani, CISO

Ali Hassani brings 25+ years of IT, cybersecurity, compliance, Microsoft infrastructure, cloud security, network security, firewall, vulnerability management, and executive advisory experience. OC Security Audit uses this experience to help organizations understand risk clearly before making remediation, compliance, or insurance decisions.

CISSPCCISOvCISO25+ Years Experience

CISSP certification badgeCCISO certification badge

View Ali Hassani’s profile for professional background, certifications, and consulting focus.

Request a professional review from OC Security Audit

Use the self-score as a starting point. For audit-ready evidence, executive reporting, and professional validation, schedule a focused review with OC Security Audit.

Contact OC Security Audit